XCVC1702 vs XCVP1052
A comparison of the AMD Versal AI Core XCVC1702 and the AMD Versal Premium XCVP1052 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XCVC1702 | XCVP1052 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Versal AI Core | AMD Versal Premium |
| LUTs as published | 448,512 LUT6 | 542,080 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈717,619 | ≈867,328 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 981,000 SLC | 1,186,000 SLC |
| DSP | 1,312 DSP Engines | 1,572 DSP Engines |
| Block RAM | 34 Mb | 26 Mb |
| Large RAM | 130 Mb | 138 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 530 | 324 |
| Transceivers | 44 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s | 8 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s, 36 × GTM 58 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen4 x16, Gen4 x8 | Gen4 x4, Gen4 x8 |
| Hard processor | 2× Arm Cortex-A72 | 2× Arm Cortex-A72 |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 3 | 3 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCVP1052 has about 21% more logic capacity (867K vs 718K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XCVP1052 has 1,572 DSP Engines against 1,312 DSP Engines on the XCVC1702.
Both have transceivers: 44 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCVC1702 and 44 at up to 58 Gb/s on the XCVP1052.
The XCVC1702 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCVP1052 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCVC1702 (Versal AI Core) and XCVP1052 (Versal Premium).