XCVH1522 vs XCVP1702
A comparison of the AMD Versal HBM XCVH1522 and the AMD Versal Premium XCVP1702 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XCVH1522 | XCVP1702 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Versal HBM | AMD Versal Premium |
| LUTs as published | 1,753,984 LUT6 | 2,540,672 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈2,806,374 | ≈4,065,075 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 3,837,000 SLC | 5,558,000 SLC |
| DSP | 7,392 DSP Engines | 10,896 DSP Engines |
| Block RAM | 89 Mb | 132 Mb |
| Large RAM | 366 Mb | 541 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 702 | 702 |
| Transceivers | 68 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 20 × GTM 58 Gb/s | 28 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 100 × GTM 58 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen5 x8, Gen5 x4 | Gen5 x8, Gen5 x4 |
| Hard processor | 2× Arm Cortex-A72 | 2× Arm Cortex-A72 |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 1 | 2 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCVP1702 has about 45% more logic capacity (4065K vs 2806K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XCVP1702 has 10,896 DSP Engines against 7,392 DSP Engines on the XCVH1522.
The XCVP1702 has more on-chip memory (673 Mb vs 455 Mb).
The XCVH1522 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCVP1702 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCVH1522 (Versal HBM) and XCVP1702 (Versal Premium).