FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XCVH1522 vs XCVP1902

A comparison of the AMD Versal HBM XCVH1522 and the AMD Versal Premium XCVP1902 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XCVH1522XCVP1902
Vendor / familyAMD Versal HBMAMD Versal Premium
LUTs as published1,753,984 LUT68,460,288 LUT6
LUT type6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈2,806,374≈13,536,461
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure3,837,000 SLC18,507,000 SLC
DSP7,392 DSP Engines6,864 DSP Engines
Block RAM89 Mb239 Mb
Large RAM366 Mb619 Mb
Max. user I/O7022,416
Transceivers68 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 20 × GTM 58 Gb/s128 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 32 × GTM 58 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen5 x8, Gen5 x4Gen5 x4
Hard processor2× Arm Cortex-A722× Arm Cortex-A72
Process7 nm7 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages12
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XCVP1902 has about 382% more logic capacity (13536K vs 2806K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the XCVH1522 has 7,392 DSP Engines against 6,864 DSP Engines on the XCVP1902.

The XCVP1902 has more on-chip memory (858 Mb vs 455 Mb).

The XCVH1522 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCVP1902 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCVH1522 (Versal HBM) and XCVP1902 (Versal Premium).