FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XCVH1582 vs XCVP1502

A comparison of the AMD Versal HBM XCVH1582 and the AMD Versal Premium XCVP1502 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XCVH1582XCVP1502
Vendor / familyAMD Versal HBMAMD Versal Premium
LUTs as published1,753,984 LUT61,720,448 LUT6
LUT type6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈2,806,374≈2,752,717
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure3,837,000 SLC3,763,000 SLC
DSP7,392 DSP Engines7,440 DSP Engines
Block RAM89 Mb89 Mb
Large RAM366 Mb366 Mb
Max. user I/O702702
Transceivers68 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 20 × GTM 58 Gb/s28 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 60 × GTM 58 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen5 x8, Gen5 x4Gen5 x8, Gen5 x4
Hard processor2× Arm Cortex-A722× Arm Cortex-A72
Process7 nm7 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages22
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 2806K and 2753K LUT4 equivalents.

For arithmetic, the XCVP1502 has 7,440 DSP Engines against 7,392 DSP Engines on the XCVH1582.

The XCVH1582 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCVP1502 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCVH1582 (Versal HBM) and XCVP1502 (Versal Premium).