FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XCVH1742 vs XCVP1702

A comparison of the AMD Versal HBM XCVH1742 and the AMD Versal Premium XCVP1702 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XCVH1742XCVP1702
Vendor / familyAMD Versal HBMAMD Versal Premium
LUTs as published2,574,208 LUT62,540,672 LUT6
LUT type6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈4,118,733≈4,065,075
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure5,631,000 SLC5,558,000 SLC
DSP10,848 DSP Engines10,896 DSP Engines
Block RAM132 Mb132 Mb
Large RAM541 Mb541 Mb
Max. user I/O702702
Transceivers68 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 60 × GTM 58 Gb/s28 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 100 × GTM 58 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen5 x8, Gen5 x4Gen5 x8, Gen5 x4
Hard processor2× Arm Cortex-A722× Arm Cortex-A72
Process7 nm7 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages12
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 4119K and 4065K LUT4 equivalents.

For arithmetic, the XCVP1702 has 10,896 DSP Engines against 10,848 DSP Engines on the XCVH1742.

The XCVH1742 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCVP1702 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCVH1742 (Versal HBM) and XCVP1702 (Versal Premium).