FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XCVH1742 vs XCVP1902

A comparison of the AMD Versal HBM XCVH1742 and the AMD Versal Premium XCVP1902 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XCVH1742XCVP1902
Vendor / familyAMD Versal HBMAMD Versal Premium
LUTs as published2,574,208 LUT68,460,288 LUT6
LUT type6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈4,118,733≈13,536,461
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure5,631,000 SLC18,507,000 SLC
DSP10,848 DSP Engines6,864 DSP Engines
Block RAM132 Mb239 Mb
Large RAM541 Mb619 Mb
Max. user I/O7022,416
Transceivers68 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 60 × GTM 58 Gb/s128 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 32 × GTM 58 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen5 x8, Gen5 x4Gen5 x4
Hard processor2× Arm Cortex-A722× Arm Cortex-A72
Process7 nm7 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages12
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XCVP1902 has about 229% more logic capacity (13536K vs 4119K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the XCVH1742 has 10,848 DSP Engines against 6,864 DSP Engines on the XCVP1902.

The XCVP1902 has more on-chip memory (858 Mb vs 673 Mb).

The XCVH1742 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCVP1902 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCVH1742 (Versal HBM) and XCVP1902 (Versal Premium).