XCVM1402 vs XCVR1652
A comparison of the AMD Versal Prime XCVM1402 and the AMD Versal RF XCVR1652 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XCVM1402 | XCVR1652 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Versal Prime | AMD Versal RF |
| LUTs as published | 565,760 LUT6 | 551,040 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈905,216 | ≈881,664 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 1,238,000 SLC | 1,205,400 SLC |
| DSP | 1,696 DSP Engines | 2,256 DSP Engines |
| Block RAM | 40 Mb | 39 Mb |
| Large RAM | 80 Mb | 100 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 670 | 470 |
| Transceivers | 24 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s | 12 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 8 × GTM 58 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen4 x16, Gen4 x8 | Gen5 x4 |
| Hard processor | 2× Arm Cortex-A72 | 2× Arm Cortex-A72 |
| Process | 7 nm | — |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 4 | 2 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 905K and 882K LUT4 equivalents.
For arithmetic, the XCVR1652 has 2,256 DSP Engines against 1,696 DSP Engines on the XCVM1402.
The XCVR1652 has more on-chip memory (139 Mb vs 120 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCVM1402 and 20 at up to 58 Gb/s on the XCVR1652.
The XCVM1402 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCVR1652 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCVM1402 (Versal Prime) and XCVR1652 (Versal RF).