FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XCVM2302 vs XCVP1052

A comparison of the AMD Versal Prime XCVM2302 and the AMD Versal Premium XCVP1052 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XCVM2302XCVP1052
Vendor / familyAMD Versal PrimeAMD Versal Premium
LUTs as published719,872 LUT6542,080 LUT6
LUT type6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈1,151,795≈867,328
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure1,575,000 SLC1,186,000 SLC
DSP1,904 DSP Engines1,572 DSP Engines
Block RAM49 Mb26 Mb
Large RAM127 Mb138 Mb
Max. user I/O324324
Transceivers8 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 36 × GTM 58 Gb/s8 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s, 36 × GTM 58 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen5 x4Gen4 x4, Gen4 x8
Hard processor2× Arm Cortex-A722× Arm Cortex-A72
Process7 nm7 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages13
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XCVM2302 has about 33% more logic capacity (1152K vs 867K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the XCVM2302 has 1,904 DSP Engines against 1,572 DSP Engines on the XCVP1052.

The XCVM2302 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCVP1052 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCVM2302 (Versal Prime) and XCVP1052 (Versal Premium).