XCVM2502 vs XCVR1952
A comparison of the AMD Versal Prime XCVM2502 and the AMD Versal RF XCVR1952 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XCVM2502 | XCVR1952 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Versal Prime | AMD Versal RF |
| LUTs as published | 900,224 LUT6 | 1,130,880 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈1,440,358 | ≈1,809,408 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 1,969,000 SLC | 2,473,800 SLC |
| DSP | 3,984 DSP Engines | 3,976 DSP Engines |
| Block RAM | 47 Mb | 80 Mb |
| Large RAM | 190 Mb | 74 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 648 | 470 |
| Transceivers | 16 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s | 20 × GTM2 112 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen5 x8 | Gen5 x4 |
| Hard processor | 2× Arm Cortex-A72 | 2× Arm Cortex-A72 |
| Process | 7 nm | — |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 1 | 1 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCVR1952 has about 26% more logic capacity (1809K vs 1440K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XCVM2502 has 3,984 DSP Engines against 3,976 DSP Engines on the XCVR1952.
The XCVM2502 has more on-chip memory (237 Mb vs 154 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCVM2502 and 20 at up to 112 Gb/s on the XCVR1952.
The XCVM2502 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCVR1952 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCVM2502 (Versal Prime) and XCVR1952 (Versal RF).