FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10AT115 vs XCVU125

A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AT115 and the AMD Virtex UltraScale XCVU125 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10AT115XCVU125
Vendor / familyAltera Arria 10AMD Virtex UltraScale
LUTs as published427,200 ALMs716,160 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈854,400≈1,145,856
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure1,506,000 LE1,567,000 SLC
DSP1,518 variable-precision DSP blocks1,200 DSP slices
Block RAM53 Mb88.6 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O624832
Transceivers72 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s, 6 × XCVR 25.78 Gb/s40 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s, 40 × GTY 30.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen3
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm20 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages15
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XCVU125 has about 34% more logic capacity (1146K vs 854K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 10AT115 is built from ALMs and the XCVU125 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (427K vs 716K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 10AT115 has 1,518 variable-precision DSP blocks against 1,200 DSP slices on the XCVU125.

The XCVU125 has more on-chip memory (88.6 Mb vs 53 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 78 at up to 25.78 Gb/s on the 10AT115 and 80 at up to 30.5 Gb/s on the XCVU125.

The 10AT115 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCVU125 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AT115 (Arria 10) and XCVU125 (Virtex UltraScale).