5AGTC7 vs XC7A200T
A comparison of the Altera Arria V 5AGTC7 and the AMD Artix-7 XC7A200T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| 5AGTC7 | XC7A200T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Altera Arria V | AMD Artix-7 |
| LUTs as published | 91,680 ALMs | 134,600 LUT6 |
| LUT type | adaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions) | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈183,360 | ≈215,360 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | 652 |
| Vendor logic figure | 242,000 LE | 215,360 LC |
| DSP | 800 variable-precision DSP blocks | 740 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 13.3 Mb | 12.8 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 544 | 500 |
| Transceivers | 6 × XCVR 6.5536 Gb/s, 12 × XCVR 10.3125 Gb/s | 16 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen2 x4 | Gen2 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 4 |
| Design tool | Altera Quartus Prime | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XC7A200T has about 17% more logic capacity (215K vs 183K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the 5AGTC7 is built from ALMs and the XC7A200T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (91.7K vs 135K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the 5AGTC7 has 800 variable-precision DSP blocks against 740 DSP slices on the XC7A200T.
Both have transceivers: 18 at up to 10.3125 Gb/s on the 5AGTC7 and 16 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A200T.
The 5AGTC7 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7A200T with AMD Vivado; open source: F4PGA or openXC7 (experimental) with Project X-Ray.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5AGTC7 (Arria V) and XC7A200T (Artix-7).