FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5AGXB7 vs XC6VHX380T

A comparison of the Altera Arria V 5AGXB7 and the AMD Virtex-6 XC6VHX380T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5AGXB7XC6VHX380T
Vendor / familyAltera Arria VAMD Virtex-6
LUTs as published190,240 ALMs239,040 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈380,480≈382,464
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure504,000 LE382,464 LC
DSP1,156 variable-precision DSP blocks864 DSP48E1 slices
Block RAM23.6 Mb27 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O704720
Transceivers36 × XCVR 6.5536 Gb/s48 × GTX 6.6 Gb/s, 24 × GTH 11.18 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2 x4Gen2 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm40 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages24
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD ISE Design Suite

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 380K and 382K LUT4 equivalents.

They use different logic architectures: the 5AGXB7 is built from ALMs and the XC6VHX380T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (190K vs 239K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 5AGXB7 has 1,156 variable-precision DSP blocks against 864 DSP48E1 slices on the XC6VHX380T.

The XC6VHX380T has more on-chip memory (27 Mb vs 23.6 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 36 at up to 6.5536 Gb/s on the 5AGXB7 and 72 at up to 11.18 Gb/s on the XC6VHX380T.

The 5AGXB7 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC6VHX380T with AMD ISE Design Suite.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5AGXB7 (Arria V) and XC6VHX380T (Virtex-6).