FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5AGZE3 vs XC7K325T

A comparison of the Altera Arria V 5AGZE3 and the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K325T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5AGZE3XC7K325T
Vendor / familyAltera Arria VAMD Kintex-7
LUTs as published135,840 ALMs203,800 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈271,680≈326,080
CoreScore (SERV cores)—967
Vendor logic figure360,000 LE326,080 LC
DSP1,044 variable-precision DSP blocks840 DSP slices
Block RAM18.7 Mb15.6 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O414500
Transceivers24 × XCVR 12.5 Gb/s16 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages24
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XC7K325T has about 20% more logic capacity (326K vs 272K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5AGZE3 is built from ALMs and the XC7K325T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (136K vs 204K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 5AGZE3 has 1,044 variable-precision DSP blocks against 840 DSP slices on the XC7K325T.

The 5AGZE3 has more on-chip memory (18.7 Mb vs 15.6 Mb).

The 5AGZE3 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7K325T with AMD Vivado; open source: openXC7 (experimental) with Project X-Ray.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5AGZE3 (Arria V) and XC7K325T (Kintex-7).