FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CEA4 vs XC6SLX45

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CEA4 and the AMD Spartan-6 XC6SLX45 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CEA4XC6SLX45
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VAMD Spartan-6
LUTs as published18,480 ALMs27,288 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈36,960≈43,661
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure49,000 LE43,661 LC
DSP66 variable-precision DSP blocks58 DSP48A1 slices
Block RAM3 Mb2 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O224358
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm45 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages54
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD ISE Design Suite

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XC6SLX45 has about 18% more logic capacity (43.7K vs 37K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CEA4 is built from ALMs and the XC6SLX45 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (18.5K vs 27.3K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 5CEA4 has 66 variable-precision DSP blocks against 58 DSP48A1 slices on the XC6SLX45.

The 5CEA4 has more on-chip memory (3 Mb vs 2 Mb).

The 5CEA4 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime; open source: Yosys + nextpnr-mistral (experimental) with Mistral and the XC6SLX45 with AMD ISE Design Suite.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CEA4 (Cyclone V) and XC6SLX45 (Spartan-6).