FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

DX 2800 vs XCVU45P

A comparison of the Altera Stratix 10 DX DX 2800 and the AMD Virtex UltraScale+ HBM XCVU45P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

DX 2800XCVU45P
Vendor / familyAltera Stratix 10 DXAMD Virtex UltraScale+ HBM
LUTs as published933,120 ALMs872,000 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈1,866,240≈1,395,200
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure2,753,000 LE1,907,000 SLC
DSP5,760 variable-precision DSP blocks5,952 DSP slices
Block RAM229 Mb47.3 Mb
Large RAM—180 Mb
Max. user I/O816416
Transceivers76 × GXP 16 Gb/s, 8 × GXE 57.8 Gb/s64 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen4 x16Gen3 x16, Gen3 x16
Hard processorNoneNone
Process14 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages10
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The DX 2800 has about 34% more logic capacity (1866K vs 1395K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the DX 2800 is built from ALMs and the XCVU45P from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (933K vs 872K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XCVU45P has 5,952 DSP slices against 5,760 variable-precision DSP blocks on the DX 2800.

Both have transceivers: 84 at up to 57.8 Gb/s on the DX 2800 and 64 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCVU45P.

The DX 2800 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCVU45P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: DX 2800 (Stratix 10 DX) and XCVU45P (Virtex UltraScale+ HBM).