FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

EP2AGX125 vs XCAU15P

A comparison of the Altera Arria II EP2AGX125 and the AMD Artix UltraScale+ XCAU15P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

EP2AGX125XCAU15P
Vendor / familyAltera Arria IIAMD Artix UltraScale+
LUTs as published49,640 ALMs78,000 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈99,280≈124,800
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure118,000 LE170,000 SLC
DSP576 18×18 multipliers576 DSP slices
Block RAM6.4 Mb5.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O452228
Transceivers12 × XCVR 6.375 Gb/s12 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen1Gen4 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process40 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages33
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XCAU15P has about 26% more logic capacity (125K vs 99.3K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the EP2AGX125 is built from ALMs and the XCAU15P from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (49.6K vs 78K) are not directly comparable.

The EP2AGX125 has more on-chip memory (6.4 Mb vs 5.1 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 12 at up to 6.375 Gb/s on the EP2AGX125 and 12 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCAU15P.

The EP2AGX125 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCAU15P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP2AGX125 (Arria II) and XCAU15P (Artix UltraScale+).