FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GW1N-4 vs M2GL005

A comparison of the Gowin LittleBee GW1N-4 and the Microchip IGLOO2 M2GL005 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GW1N-4M2GL005
Vendor / familyGowin LittleBeeMicrochip IGLOO2
LUTs as published4,608 LUT46,060 LUT4
LUT type4-input look-up table4-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈4,608≈6,060
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure—6,060 LE
DSP16 18×18 multipliers11 18×18 math blocks (MACC)
Block RAM0.2 Mb0.2 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O218209
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process55 nm65 nm
Configuration memoryEmbedded flashNon-volatile (flash)
Packages114
Design toolGowin EDAMicrochip Libero SoC

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The M2GL005 has about 32% more logic capacity (6.1K vs 4.6K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the GW1N-4 has 16 18×18 multipliers against 11 18×18 math blocks (MACC) on the M2GL005.

Configuration memory: embedded flash on the GW1N-4, non-volatile (flash) on the M2GL005.

The GW1N-4 is designed with Gowin EDA and the M2GL005 with Microchip Libero SoC.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW1N-4 (LittleBee) and M2GL005 (IGLOO2).