FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GW3AT-6 vs LIF-MD6000

A comparison of the Gowin Arora III GW3AT-6 and the Lattice CrossLink LIF-MD6000 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GW3AT-6LIF-MD6000
Vendor / familyGowin Arora IIILattice CrossLink
LUTs as published6,912 LUT45,936 LUT4
LUT type4-input look-up table4-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈6,912≈5,936
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure——
DSP— DSP blocks— 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0.3 Mb0.2 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O7037
Transceivers1 × SERDES 8.5 Gb/sNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process—40 nm
Configuration memorySRAMNVCM (one-time programmable)
Packages05
Design toolGowin EDALattice Diamond

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The GW3AT-6 has about 16% more logic capacity (6.9K vs 5.9K LUT4 equivalents).

The GW3AT-6 has more on-chip memory (0.3 Mb vs 0.2 Mb).

Only the GW3AT-6 has multi-gigabit transceivers (1 8.5 Gb/s).

Configuration memory: sram on the GW3AT-6, nvcm (one-time programmable) on the LIF-MD6000.

The GW3AT-6 is designed with Gowin EDA and the LIF-MD6000 with Lattice Diamond.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW3AT-6 (Arora III) and LIF-MD6000 (CrossLink).