GW5AT-75 vs XC6SLX100T
A comparison of the Gowin Arora V GW5AT-75 and the AMD Spartan-6 XC6SLX100T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| GW5AT-75 | XC6SLX100T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Gowin Arora V | AMD Spartan-6 |
| LUTs as published | 86,688 LUT4 | 63,288 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 4-input look-up table | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈86,688 | ≈101,261 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | — | 101,261 LC |
| DSP | 213 27×18 DSP blocks | 180 DSP48A1 slices |
| Block RAM | 4.5 Mb | 4.7 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 312 | 498 |
| Transceivers | 8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s | 8 × GTP 3.2 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 x8 | Gen1 x1 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 0 | 4 |
| Design tool | Gowin EDA | AMD ISE Design Suite |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XC6SLX100T has about 17% more logic capacity (101K vs 86.7K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the GW5AT-75 is built from LUT4 and the XC6SLX100T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (86.7K vs 63.3K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the GW5AT-75 has 213 27×18 DSP blocks against 180 DSP48A1 slices on the XC6SLX100T.
Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the GW5AT-75 and 8 at up to 3.2 Gb/s on the XC6SLX100T.
The GW5AT-75 is designed with Gowin EDA and the XC6SLX100T with AMD ISE Design Suite.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW5AT-75 (Arora V) and XC6SLX100T (Spartan-6).