FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GX 1100 vs MX 1650 E-tile

A comparison of the Altera Stratix 10 GX/SX GX 1100 and the Altera Stratix 10 MX MX 1650 E-tile using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GX 1100MX 1650 E-tile
Vendor / familyAltera Stratix 10 GX/SXAltera Stratix 10 MX
LUTs as published449,280 ALMs569,200 ALMs
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)adaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈898,560≈1,138,400
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure1,325,000 LE1,679,000 LE
DSP2,592 variable-precision DSP blocks3,326 variable-precision DSP blocks
Block RAM107 Mb120 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O688584
Transceivers32 × XCVR 28.3 Gb/s, 16 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s72 × GXE 57.8 Gb/s, 16 × GXT 28.3 Gb/s, 8 × GX 17.4 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x16Gen3 x16
Hard processorNoneNone
Process14 nm14 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages11
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAltera Quartus Prime

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The MX 1650 E-tile has about 27% more logic capacity (1138K vs 899K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the MX 1650 E-tile has 3,326 variable-precision DSP blocks against 2,592 variable-precision DSP blocks on the GX 1100.

The MX 1650 E-tile has more on-chip memory (120 Mb vs 107 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 48 at up to 28.3 Gb/s on the GX 1100 and 96 at up to 57.8 Gb/s on the MX 1650 E-tile.

The GX 1100 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the MX 1650 E-tile with Altera Quartus Prime.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GX 1100 (Stratix 10 GX/SX) and MX 1650 E-tile (Stratix 10 MX).