FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GX 400 vs XC6VHX255T

A comparison of the Altera Stratix 10 GX/SX GX 400 and the AMD Virtex-6 XC6VHX255T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GX 400XC6VHX255T
Vendor / familyAltera Stratix 10 GX/SXAMD Virtex-6
LUTs as published128,160 ALMs158,400 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈256,320≈253,440
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure378,000 LE253,440 LC
DSP648 variable-precision DSP blocks576 DSP48E1 slices
Block RAM30 Mb18.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O374480
Transceivers16 × XCVR 28.3 Gb/s, 8 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s24 × GTX 6.6 Gb/s, 24 × GTH 11.18 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x16Gen2 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process14 nm40 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages12
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD ISE Design Suite

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 256K and 253K LUT4 equivalents.

They use different logic architectures: the GX 400 is built from ALMs and the XC6VHX255T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (128K vs 158K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the GX 400 has 648 variable-precision DSP blocks against 576 DSP48E1 slices on the XC6VHX255T.

The GX 400 has more on-chip memory (30 Mb vs 18.1 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 28.3 Gb/s on the GX 400 and 48 at up to 11.18 Gb/s on the XC6VHX255T.

The GX 400 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC6VHX255T with AMD ISE Design Suite.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GX 400 (Stratix 10 GX/SX) and XC6VHX255T (Virtex-6).