LCMXO3LF-6900 vs LFMNX-50
A comparison of the Lattice MachXO3 LCMXO3LF-6900 and the Lattice Mach-NX LFMNX-50 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| LCMXO3LF-6900 | LFMNX-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Lattice MachXO3 | Lattice Mach-NX |
| LUTs as published | 6,900 LUT4 | 7,000 LUT4 |
| LUT type | 4-input look-up table | 4-input look-up table |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈6,900 | ≈7,000 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | — | 8,400 LC |
| DSP | — 18×18 multipliers | — 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | 0.2 Mb | 0.4 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 335 | 378 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | — | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | — | Internal flash |
| Packages | 5 | 2 |
| Design tool | Lattice Diamond | Lattice Radiant |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 6.9K and 7K LUT4 equivalents.
The LFMNX-50 has more on-chip memory (0.4 Mb vs 0.2 Mb).
Configuration memory: — on the LCMXO3LF-6900, internal flash on the LFMNX-50.
The LCMXO3LF-6900 is designed with Lattice Diamond and the LFMNX-50 with Lattice Radiant.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LCMXO3LF-6900 (MachXO3) and LFMNX-50 (Mach-NX).