FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LFE3-95EA vs XC6SLX100T

A comparison of the Lattice LatticeECP3 LFE3-95EA and the AMD Spartan-6 XC6SLX100T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LFE3-95EAXC6SLX100T
Vendor / familyLattice LatticeECP3AMD Spartan-6
LUTs as published92,000 LUT463,288 LUT6
LUT type4-input look-up table6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈92,000≈101,261
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure—101,261 LC
DSP128 18×18 multipliers180 DSP48A1 slices
Block RAM4.3 Mb4.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O490498
Transceivers12 × SERDES 3.2 Gb/s8 × GTP 3.2 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen1 x1
Hard processorNoneNone
Process65 nm45 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages34
Design toolLattice DiamondAMD ISE Design Suite

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XC6SLX100T has about 10% more logic capacity (101K vs 92K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the LFE3-95EA is built from LUT4 and the XC6SLX100T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (92K vs 63.3K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC6SLX100T has 180 DSP48A1 slices against 128 18×18 multipliers on the LFE3-95EA.

The LFE3-95EA is designed with Lattice Diamond and the XC6SLX100T with AMD ISE Design Suite.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LFE3-95EA (LatticeECP3) and XC6SLX100T (Spartan-6).