FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LIF-MD6000 vs SLG47920

A comparison of the Lattice CrossLink LIF-MD6000 and the Renesas ForgeFPGA SLG47920 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LIF-MD6000SLG47920
Vendor / familyLattice CrossLinkRenesas ForgeFPGA
LUTs as published5,936 LUT42,240 LUT5
LUT type4-input look-up table5-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈5,936≈2,912
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure——
DSP— 18×18 multipliers— DSP blocks
Block RAM0.2 Mb0.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O3732
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process40 nm—
Configuration memoryNVCM (one-time programmable)Non-volatile (OTP) or SPI flash
Packages51
Design toolLattice DiamondRenesas Go Configure Software Hub

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The LIF-MD6000 has about 104% more logic capacity (5.9K vs 2.9K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the LIF-MD6000 is built from LUT4 and the SLG47920 from LUT5, so the raw LUT counts (5.9K vs 2.2K) are not directly comparable.

The LIF-MD6000 has more on-chip memory (0.2 Mb vs 0.1 Mb).

Configuration memory: nvcm (one-time programmable) on the LIF-MD6000, non-volatile (otp) or spi flash on the SLG47920.

The LIF-MD6000 is designed with Lattice Diamond and the SLG47920 with Renesas Go Configure Software Hub.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LIF-MD6000 (CrossLink) and SLG47920 (ForgeFPGA).