Mach-N2 MH10 vs XC7K70T
A comparison of the Lattice Mach-N2 Mach-N2 MH10 and the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K70T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| Mach-N2 MH10 | XC7K70T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Lattice Mach-N2 | AMD Kintex-7 |
| LUTs as published | 61,000 LUT4 | 41,000 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 4-input look-up table | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈61,000 | ≈65,600 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 100,000 LC | 65,600 LC |
| DSP | 240 18×18 multipliers | 240 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 5.5 Mb | 4.7 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 196 | 300 |
| Transceivers | 4 × SERDES 16 Gb/s | 8 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | None | Gen2 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | Internal flash | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 2 |
| Design tool | Lattice Radiant | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XC7K70T has about 8% more logic capacity (65.6K vs 61K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the Mach-N2 MH10 is built from LUT4 and the XC7K70T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (61K vs 41K) are not directly comparable.
The Mach-N2 MH10 has more on-chip memory (5.5 Mb vs 4.7 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 4 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Mach-N2 MH10 and 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7K70T.
Configuration memory: internal flash on the Mach-N2 MH10, sram on the XC7K70T.
The Mach-N2 MH10 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the XC7K70T with AMD Vivado; open source: openXC7 (experimental) with Project X-Ray.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Mach-N2 MH10 (Mach-N2) and XC7K70T (Kintex-7).