Mach-N2 MH20 vs XC7K160T
A comparison of the Lattice Mach-N2 Mach-N2 MH20 and the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K160T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| Mach-N2 MH20 | XC7K160T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Lattice Mach-N2 | AMD Kintex-7 |
| LUTs as published | 135,000 LUT4 | 101,400 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 4-input look-up table | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈135,000 | ≈162,240 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | 481 |
| Vendor logic figure | 220,000 LC | 162,240 LC |
| DSP | 520 18×18 multipliers | 600 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 12 Mb | 11.4 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 248 | 400 |
| Transceivers | 4 × SERDES 16 Gb/s | 8 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | None | Gen2 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | Internal flash | SRAM |
| Packages | 1 | 3 |
| Design tool | Lattice Radiant | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XC7K160T has about 20% more logic capacity (162K vs 135K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the Mach-N2 MH20 is built from LUT4 and the XC7K160T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (135K vs 101K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XC7K160T has 600 DSP slices against 520 18×18 multipliers on the Mach-N2 MH20.
Both have transceivers: 4 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Mach-N2 MH20 and 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7K160T.
Configuration memory: internal flash on the Mach-N2 MH20, sram on the XC7K160T.
The Mach-N2 MH20 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the XC7K160T with AMD Vivado; open source: openXC7 (experimental) with Project X-Ray.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Mach-N2 MH20 (Mach-N2) and XC7K160T (Kintex-7).