FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

MX 1650 vs XCVU5P

A comparison of the Altera Stratix 10 MX MX 1650 and the AMD Virtex UltraScale+ XCVU5P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

MX 1650XCVU5P
Vendor / familyAltera Stratix 10 MXAMD Virtex UltraScale+
LUTs as published569,200 ALMs601,000 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈1,138,400≈961,600
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure1,679,000 LE1,314,000 SLC
DSP3,326 variable-precision DSP blocks3,474 DSP slices
Block RAM120 Mb36 Mb
Large RAM—132.2 Mb
Max. user I/O656832
Transceivers64 × GXT 28.3 Gb/s, 32 × GX 17.4 Gb/s80 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x16Gen3 x16
Hard processorNoneNone
Process14 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages10
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The MX 1650 has about 18% more logic capacity (1138K vs 962K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the MX 1650 is built from ALMs and the XCVU5P from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (569K vs 601K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XCVU5P has 3,474 DSP slices against 3,326 variable-precision DSP blocks on the MX 1650.

The XCVU5P has more on-chip memory (168.2 Mb vs 120 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 96 at up to 28.3 Gb/s on the MX 1650 and 80 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCVU5P.

The MX 1650 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCVU5P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: MX 1650 (Stratix 10 MX) and XCVU5P (Virtex UltraScale+).