FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

Ti1600 vs XC2VP3102

A comparison of the Efinix Titanium Ti1600 and the AMD Versal Premium Gen 2 XC2VP3102 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

Ti1600XC2VP3102
Vendor / familyEfinix TitaniumAMD Versal Premium Gen 2
LUTs as publishedNot published643,456 LUT6
LUT type4-input look-up table6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈1,578,000≈1,029,530
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure1,578,000 LE1,407,560 SLC
DSP3,050 DSP blocks3,332 DSP Engines
Block RAM93.6 Mb44 Mb
Large RAM—81 Mb
Max. user I/O480438
Transceivers40 × SERDES 25.8 Gb/s32 × GTM2 112 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen4 x8Gen6 x8
Hard processor4× RISC-V RV642× Arm Cortex-A72
Process16 nm—
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages22
Design toolEfinix EfinityAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The Ti1600 has about 53% more logic capacity (1578K vs 1030K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the Ti1600 is built from LUT4 and the XC2VP3102 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (— vs 643K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC2VP3102 has 3,332 DSP Engines against 3,050 DSP blocks on the Ti1600.

The XC2VP3102 has more on-chip memory (125 Mb vs 93.6 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 40 at up to 25.8 Gb/s on the Ti1600 and 32 at up to 112 Gb/s on the XC2VP3102.

The Ti1600 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XC2VP3102 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Ti1600 (Titanium) and XC2VP3102 (Versal Premium Gen 2).