Ti2000 vs XCVR1902
A comparison of the Efinix Titanium Ti2000 and the AMD Versal RF XCVR1902 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| Ti2000 | XCVR1902 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Efinix Titanium | AMD Versal RF |
| LUTs as published | Not published | 1,130,880 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 4-input look-up table | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈1,974,067 | ≈1,809,408 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 1,974,067 LE | 2,473,800 SLC |
| DSP | 3,808 DSP blocks | 3,976 DSP Engines |
| Block RAM | 117 Mb | 80 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | 74 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 480 | 470 |
| Transceivers | 40 × SERDES 25.8 Gb/s | 20 × GTM2 112 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen4 x8 | Gen5 x4 |
| Hard processor | 4× RISC-V RV64 | 2× Arm Cortex-A72 |
| Process | 16 nm | — |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 1 |
| Design tool | Efinix Efinity | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The Ti2000 has about 9% more logic capacity (1974K vs 1809K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the Ti2000 is built from LUT4 and the XCVR1902 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (— vs 1131K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XCVR1902 has 3,976 DSP Engines against 3,808 DSP blocks on the Ti2000.
The XCVR1902 has more on-chip memory (154 Mb vs 117 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 40 at up to 25.8 Gb/s on the Ti2000 and 20 at up to 112 Gb/s on the XCVR1902.
The Ti2000 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XCVR1902 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Ti2000 (Titanium) and XCVR1902 (Versal RF).