FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

Ti660 vs XC2VM3654

A comparison of the Efinix Titanium Ti660 and the AMD Versal Prime Gen 2 XC2VM3654 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

Ti660XC2VM3654
Vendor / familyEfinix TitaniumAMD Versal Prime Gen 2
LUTs as publishedNot published318,080 LUT6
LUT type4-input look-up table6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈656,916≈508,928
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure656,916 LE695,800 SLC
DSP1,260 DSP blocks1,428 DSP Engines
Block RAM38.9 Mb22.2 Mb
Large RAM—23.3 Mb
Max. user I/O480310
Transceivers24 × SERDES 25.8 Gb/s24 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen4 x8Gen5 x4
Hard processor4× RISC-V RV644× Arm Cortex-A78AE
Process16 nm—
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages23
Design toolEfinix EfinityAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The Ti660 has about 29% more logic capacity (657K vs 509K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the Ti660 is built from LUT4 and the XC2VM3654 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (— vs 318K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC2VM3654 has 1,428 DSP Engines against 1,260 DSP blocks on the Ti660.

The XC2VM3654 has more on-chip memory (45.5 Mb vs 38.9 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 25.8 Gb/s on the Ti660 and 24 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XC2VM3654.

The Ti660 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XC2VM3654 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Ti660 (Titanium) and XC2VM3654 (Versal Prime Gen 2).