XC2VP3102 vs XCVR1652
A comparison of the AMD Versal Premium Gen 2 XC2VP3102 and the AMD Versal RF XCVR1652 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XC2VP3102 | XCVR1652 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Versal Premium Gen 2 | AMD Versal RF |
| LUTs as published | 643,456 LUT6 | 551,040 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈1,029,530 | ≈881,664 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 1,407,560 SLC | 1,205,400 SLC |
| DSP | 3,332 DSP Engines | 2,256 DSP Engines |
| Block RAM | 44 Mb | 39 Mb |
| Large RAM | 81 Mb | 100 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 438 | 470 |
| Transceivers | 32 × GTM2 112 Gb/s | 12 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 8 × GTM 58 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen6 x8 | Gen5 x4 |
| Hard processor | 2× Arm Cortex-A72 | 2× Arm Cortex-A72 |
| Process | — | — |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 2 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XC2VP3102 has about 17% more logic capacity (1030K vs 882K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XC2VP3102 has 3,332 DSP Engines against 2,256 DSP Engines on the XCVR1652.
The XCVR1652 has more on-chip memory (139 Mb vs 125 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 32 at up to 112 Gb/s on the XC2VP3102 and 20 at up to 58 Gb/s on the XCVR1652.
The XC2VP3102 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCVR1652 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC2VP3102 (Versal Premium Gen 2) and XCVR1652 (Versal RF).