FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XC6SLX100 vs XC7S100

A comparison of the AMD Spartan-6 XC6SLX100 and the AMD Spartan-7 XC7S100 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XC6SLX100XC7S100
Vendor / familyAMD Spartan-6AMD Spartan-7
LUTs as published63,288 LUT664,000 LUT6
LUT type6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈101,261≈102,400
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure101,261 LC102,400 LC
DSP180 DSP48A1 slices160 DSP slices
Block RAM4.7 Mb4.2 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O480400
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process45 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages32
Design toolAMD ISE Design SuiteAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 101K and 102K LUT4 equivalents.

For arithmetic, the XC6SLX100 has 180 DSP48A1 slices against 160 DSP slices on the XC7S100.

The XC6SLX100 has more on-chip memory (4.7 Mb vs 4.2 Mb).

The XC6SLX100 is designed with AMD ISE Design Suite and the XC7S100 with AMD Vivado; open source: openXC7 (experimental) with Project X-Ray.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC6SLX100 (Spartan-6) and XC7S100 (Spartan-7).