FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XC6SLX75T vs XC7A75T

A comparison of the AMD Spartan-6 XC6SLX75T and the AMD Artix-7 XC7A75T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XC6SLX75TXC7A75T
Vendor / familyAMD Spartan-6AMD Artix-7
LUTs as published46,648 LUT647,200 LUT6
LUT type6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈74,637≈75,520
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure74,637 LC75,520 LC
DSP132 DSP48A1 slices180 DSP slices
Block RAM3 Mb3.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O348300
Transceivers8 × GTP 3.2 Gb/s8 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen1 x1Gen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process45 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages34
Design toolAMD ISE Design SuiteAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 74.6K and 75.5K LUT4 equivalents.

For arithmetic, the XC7A75T has 180 DSP slices against 132 DSP48A1 slices on the XC6SLX75T.

The XC7A75T has more on-chip memory (3.7 Mb vs 3 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 3.2 Gb/s on the XC6SLX75T and 8 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A75T.

The XC6SLX75T is designed with AMD ISE Design Suite and the XC7A75T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC6SLX75T (Spartan-6) and XC7A75T (Artix-7).