XC6VHX565T vs XCVU080
A comparison of the AMD Virtex-6 XC6VHX565T and the AMD Virtex UltraScale XCVU080 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XC6VHX565T | XCVU080 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Virtex-6 | AMD Virtex UltraScale |
| LUTs as published | 354,240 LUT6 | 445,712 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈566,784 | ≈713,139 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 566,784 LC | 975,000 SLC |
| DSP | 864 DSP48E1 slices | 672 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 32.1 Mb | 50 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 720 | 832 |
| Transceivers | 48 × GTX 6.6 Gb/s, 24 × GTH 11.18 Gb/s | 32 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s, 32 × GTY 30.5 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen2 x8 | Gen3 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 40 nm | 20 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 5 |
| Design tool | AMD ISE Design Suite | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCVU080 has about 26% more logic capacity (713K vs 567K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XC6VHX565T has 864 DSP48E1 slices against 672 DSP slices on the XCVU080.
The XCVU080 has more on-chip memory (50 Mb vs 32.1 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 72 at up to 11.18 Gb/s on the XC6VHX565T and 64 at up to 30.5 Gb/s on the XCVU080.
The XC6VHX565T is designed with AMD ISE Design Suite and the XCVU080 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC6VHX565T (Virtex-6) and XCVU080 (Virtex UltraScale).