FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XC6VLX75T vs XCAU10P

A comparison of the AMD Virtex-6 XC6VLX75T and the AMD Artix UltraScale+ XCAU10P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XC6VLX75TXCAU10P
Vendor / familyAMD Virtex-6AMD Artix UltraScale+
LUTs as published46,560 LUT644,000 LUT6
LUT type6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈74,496≈70,400
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure74,496 LC96,000 SLC
DSP288 DSP48E1 slices400 DSP slices
Block RAM5.5 Mb3.5 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O360228
Transceivers12 × GTX 6.6 Gb/s12 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2 x8Gen4 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process40 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages23
Design toolAMD ISE Design SuiteAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 74.5K and 70.4K LUT4 equivalents.

For arithmetic, the XCAU10P has 400 DSP slices against 288 DSP48E1 slices on the XC6VLX75T.

The XC6VLX75T has more on-chip memory (5.5 Mb vs 3.5 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 12 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC6VLX75T and 12 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCAU10P.

The XC6VLX75T is designed with AMD ISE Design Suite and the XCAU10P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC6VLX75T (Virtex-6) and XCAU10P (Artix UltraScale+).