FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XC7V2000T vs XCVU440

A comparison of the AMD Virtex-7 XC7V2000T and the AMD Virtex UltraScale XCVU440 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XC7V2000TXCVU440
Vendor / familyAMD Virtex-7AMD Virtex UltraScale
LUTs as published1,221,600 LUT62,532,960 LUT6
LUT type6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈1,954,560≈4,052,736
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure1,954,560 LC5,541,000 SLC
DSP2,160 DSP slices2,880 DSP slices
Block RAM45.4 Mb88.6 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O1,2001,456
Transceivers36 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s48 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2Gen3
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm20 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages22
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XCVU440 has about 107% more logic capacity (4053K vs 1955K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the XCVU440 has 2,880 DSP slices against 2,160 DSP slices on the XC7V2000T.

The XCVU440 has more on-chip memory (88.6 Mb vs 45.4 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 36 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7V2000T and 48 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCVU440.

The XC7V2000T is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCVU440 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC7V2000T (Virtex-7) and XCVU440 (Virtex UltraScale).