XCAU20P vs XCKU025
A comparison of the AMD Artix UltraScale+ XCAU20P and the AMD Kintex UltraScale XCKU025 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XCAU20P | XCKU025 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Artix UltraScale+ | AMD Kintex UltraScale |
| LUTs as published | 109,000 LUT6 | 145,440 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈174,400 | ≈232,704 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 238,000 SLC | 318,000 SLC |
| DSP | 900 DSP slices | 1,152 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 7 Mb | 12.7 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 228 | 312 |
| Transceivers | 12 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s | 12 × GTH/GTY 16.3 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 x8 | Gen3 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 16 nm | 20 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 1 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCKU025 has about 33% more logic capacity (233K vs 174K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XCKU025 has 1,152 DSP slices against 900 DSP slices on the XCAU20P.
The XCKU025 has more on-chip memory (12.7 Mb vs 7 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 12 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCAU20P and 12 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCKU025.
The XCAU20P is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCKU025 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCAU20P (Artix UltraScale+) and XCKU025 (Kintex UltraScale).