XCKU035 vs XCKU3P
A comparison of the AMD Kintex UltraScale XCKU035 and the AMD Kintex UltraScale+ XCKU3P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XCKU035 | XCKU3P | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Kintex UltraScale | AMD Kintex UltraScale+ |
| LUTs as published | 203,128 LUT6 | 163,000 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈325,005 | ≈260,800 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 444,000 SLC | 356,000 SLC |
| DSP | 1,700 DSP slices | 1,368 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 19 Mb | 12.7 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | 13.5 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 520 | 304 |
| Transceivers | 16 × GTH/GTY 16.3 Gb/s | 16 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 | Gen3 x16 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 20 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 4 | 4 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCKU035 has about 25% more logic capacity (325K vs 261K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XCKU035 has 1,700 DSP slices against 1,368 DSP slices on the XCKU3P.
The XCKU3P has more on-chip memory (26.2 Mb vs 19 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCKU035 and 16 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCKU3P.
The XCKU035 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCKU3P with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCKU035 (Kintex UltraScale) and XCKU3P (Kintex UltraScale+).