XCKU095 vs XCVU080
A comparison of the AMD Kintex UltraScale XCKU095 and the AMD Virtex UltraScale XCVU080 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XCKU095 | XCVU080 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Kintex UltraScale | AMD Virtex UltraScale |
| LUTs as published | 537,600 LUT6 | 445,712 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈860,160 | ≈713,139 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 1,176,000 SLC | 975,000 SLC |
| DSP | 768 DSP slices | 672 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 59.1 Mb | 50 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 702 | 832 |
| Transceivers | 64 × GTH/GTY 16.3 Gb/s | 32 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s, 32 × GTY 30.5 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 | Gen3 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 20 nm | 20 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 4 | 5 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCKU095 has about 21% more logic capacity (860K vs 713K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XCKU095 has 768 DSP slices against 672 DSP slices on the XCVU080.
The XCKU095 has more on-chip memory (59.1 Mb vs 50 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 64 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCKU095 and 64 at up to 30.5 Gb/s on the XCVU080.
The XCKU095 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCVU080 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCKU095 (Kintex UltraScale) and XCVU080 (Virtex UltraScale).