XCVE2302 vs XCZU63DR
A comparison of the AMD Versal AI Edge XCVE2302 and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC XCZU63DR using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XCVE2302 | XCZU63DR | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Versal AI Edge | AMD Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC |
| LUTs as published | 150,272 LUT6 | 180,000 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈240,435 | ≈288,000 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 328,720 SLC | 393,000 SLC |
| DSP | 464 DSP Engines | 1,200 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 5.4 Mb | 17.6 Mb |
| Large RAM | 43.6 Mb | 36.6 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 238 | 154 |
| Transceivers | 8 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s | 4 × GTY 28.21 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen4 x8 | None |
| Hard processor | 2× Arm Cortex-A72 | 4× Arm Cortex-A53 |
| Process | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 1 | 1 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCZU63DR has about 20% more logic capacity (288K vs 240K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XCZU63DR has 1,200 DSP slices against 464 DSP Engines on the XCVE2302.
Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCVE2302 and 4 at up to 28.21 Gb/s on the XCZU63DR.
The XCVE2302 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCZU63DR with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCVE2302 (Versal AI Edge) and XCZU63DR (Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC).