FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XCVH1542 vs XCVP2502

A comparison of the AMD Versal HBM XCVH1542 and the AMD Versal Premium XCVP2502 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XCVH1542XCVP2502
Vendor / familyAMD Versal HBMAMD Versal Premium
LUTs as published1,753,984 LUT61,708,672 LUT6
LUT type6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈2,806,374≈2,733,875
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure3,837,000 SLC3,738,000 SLC
DSP7,392 DSP Engines7,392 DSP Engines
Block RAM89 Mb89 Mb
Large RAM366 Mb366 Mb
Max. user I/O702702
Transceivers68 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 20 × GTM 58 Gb/s28 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 60 × GTM 58 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen5 x8, Gen5 x4Gen5 x8, Gen5 x4
Hard processor2× Arm Cortex-A722× Arm Cortex-A72
Process7 nm7 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages22
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 2806K and 2734K LUT4 equivalents.

The XCVH1542 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCVP2502 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCVH1542 (Versal HBM) and XCVP2502 (Versal Premium).