XCZU15EG vs XCZU25DR
A comparison of the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC XCZU15EG and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC XCZU25DR using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XCZU15EG | XCZU25DR | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC | AMD Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC |
| LUTs as published | 341,000 LUT6 | 310,000 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈545,600 | ≈496,000 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 747,000 SLC | 678,000 SLC |
| DSP | 3,528 DSP slices | 3,145 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 26.2 Mb | 27.8 Mb |
| Large RAM | 31.5 Mb | 13.5 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 328 | 347 |
| Transceivers | 24 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s | 8 × GTY 28.21 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | None | Gen3 x16 |
| Hard processor | 4× Arm Cortex-A53 | 4× Arm Cortex-A53 |
| Process | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 2 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCZU15EG has about 10% more logic capacity (546K vs 496K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XCZU15EG has 3,528 DSP slices against 3,145 DSP slices on the XCZU25DR.
The XCZU15EG has more on-chip memory (57.7 Mb vs 41.3 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCZU15EG and 8 at up to 28.21 Gb/s on the XCZU25DR.
The XCZU15EG is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCZU25DR with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCZU15EG (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC) and XCZU25DR (Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC).