XCZU25DR vs XCZU9CG
A comparison of the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC XCZU25DR and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC XCZU9CG using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XCZU25DR | XCZU9CG | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC | AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC |
| LUTs as published | 310,000 LUT6 | 274,000 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈496,000 | ≈438,400 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 678,000 SLC | 600,000 SLC |
| DSP | 3,145 DSP slices | 2,520 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 27.8 Mb | 32.1 Mb |
| Large RAM | 13.5 Mb | — |
| Max. user I/O | 347 | 328 |
| Transceivers | 8 × GTY 28.21 Gb/s | 24 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 x16 | None |
| Hard processor | 4× Arm Cortex-A53 | 2× Arm Cortex-A53 |
| Process | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 2 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCZU25DR has about 13% more logic capacity (496K vs 438K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XCZU25DR has 3,145 DSP slices against 2,520 DSP slices on the XCZU9CG.
The XCZU25DR has more on-chip memory (41.3 Mb vs 32.1 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 28.21 Gb/s on the XCZU25DR and 24 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCZU9CG.
The XCZU25DR is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCZU9CG with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCZU25DR (Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC) and XCZU9CG (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC).