XCZU5CG vs XCZU64DR
A comparison of the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC XCZU5CG and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC XCZU64DR using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XCZU5CG | XCZU64DR | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC | AMD Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC |
| LUTs as published | 117,000 LUT6 | 150,000 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈187,200 | ≈240,000 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 256,000 SLC | 328,000 SLC |
| DSP | 1,248 DSP slices | 1,872 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 5.1 Mb | 15.8 Mb |
| Large RAM | 18 Mb | 22.5 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 252 | 154 |
| Transceivers | 16 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s | 8 × GTY 28.21 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 x8 | None |
| Hard processor | 2× Arm Cortex-A53 | 4× Arm Cortex-A53 |
| Process | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 3 | 1 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCZU64DR has about 28% more logic capacity (240K vs 187K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XCZU64DR has 1,872 DSP slices against 1,248 DSP slices on the XCZU5CG.
The XCZU64DR has more on-chip memory (38.3 Mb vs 23.1 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCZU5CG and 8 at up to 28.21 Gb/s on the XCZU64DR.
The XCZU5CG is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCZU64DR with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCZU5CG (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC) and XCZU64DR (Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC).