EP2AGX65 vs XCAU10P
A comparison of the Altera Arria II EP2AGX65 and the AMD Artix UltraScale+ XCAU10P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| EP2AGX65 | XCAU10P | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Altera Arria II | AMD Artix UltraScale+ |
| LUTs as published | 25,300 ALMs | 44,000 LUT6 |
| LUT type | adaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions) | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈50,600 | ≈70,400 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 60,000 LE | 96,000 SLC |
| DSP | 312 18×18 multipliers | 400 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 4.3 Mb | 3.5 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 364 | 228 |
| Transceivers | 8 × XCVR 6.375 Gb/s | 12 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen1 | Gen4 x8 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 40 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 3 | 3 |
| Design tool | Altera Quartus Prime | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCAU10P has about 39% more logic capacity (70.4K vs 50.6K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the EP2AGX65 is built from ALMs and the XCAU10P from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (25.3K vs 44K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XCAU10P has 400 DSP slices against 312 18×18 multipliers on the EP2AGX65.
The EP2AGX65 has more on-chip memory (4.3 Mb vs 3.5 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 6.375 Gb/s on the EP2AGX65 and 12 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCAU10P.
The EP2AGX65 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCAU10P with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP2AGX65 (Arria II) and XCAU10P (Artix UltraScale+).