FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

EP2AGX95 vs XCAU10P

A comparison of the Altera Arria II EP2AGX95 and the AMD Artix UltraScale+ XCAU10P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

EP2AGX95XCAU10P
Vendor / familyAltera Arria IIAMD Artix UltraScale+
LUTs as published37,470 ALMs44,000 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈74,940≈70,400
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure89,000 LE96,000 SLC
DSP448 18×18 multipliers400 DSP slices
Block RAM5.4 Mb3.5 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O452228
Transceivers12 × XCVR 6.375 Gb/s12 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen1Gen4 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process40 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages33
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 74.9K and 70.4K LUT4 equivalents.

They use different logic architectures: the EP2AGX95 is built from ALMs and the XCAU10P from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (37.5K vs 44K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the EP2AGX95 has 448 18×18 multipliers against 400 DSP slices on the XCAU10P.

The EP2AGX95 has more on-chip memory (5.4 Mb vs 3.5 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 12 at up to 6.375 Gb/s on the EP2AGX95 and 12 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCAU10P.

The EP2AGX95 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCAU10P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP2AGX95 (Arria II) and XCAU10P (Artix UltraScale+).