FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

M2GL005 vs XC6SLX4

A comparison of the Microchip IGLOO2 M2GL005 and the AMD Spartan-6 XC6SLX4 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

M2GL005XC6SLX4
Vendor / familyMicrochip IGLOO2AMD Spartan-6
LUTs as published6,060 LUT42,400 LUT6
LUT type4-input look-up table6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈6,060≈3,840
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure6,060 LE3,840 LC
DSP11 18×18 math blocks (MACC)8 DSP48A1 slices
Block RAM0.2 Mb0.2 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O209132
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process65 nm45 nm
Configuration memoryNon-volatile (flash)SRAM
Packages43
Design toolMicrochip Libero SoCAMD ISE Design Suite

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The M2GL005 has about 58% more logic capacity (6.1K vs 3.8K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the M2GL005 is built from LUT4 and the XC6SLX4 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (6.1K vs 2.4K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the M2GL005 has 11 18×18 math blocks (MACC) against 8 DSP48A1 slices on the XC6SLX4.

The XC6SLX4 has more on-chip memory (0.2 Mb vs 0.2 Mb).

Configuration memory: non-volatile (flash) on the M2GL005, sram on the XC6SLX4.

The M2GL005 is designed with Microchip Libero SoC and the XC6SLX4 with AMD ISE Design Suite.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: M2GL005 (IGLOO2) and XC6SLX4 (Spartan-6).