XC2VM3654 vs XCZU65DR

A comparison of the AMD Versal Prime Gen 2 XC2VM3654 and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC XCZU65DR using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

	XC2VM3654	XCZU65DR
Vendor / family	AMD Versal Prime Gen 2	AMD Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC
LUTs as published	318,080 LUT6	224,000 LUT6
LUT type	6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs	6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)	≈508,928	≈358,400
CoreScore (SERV cores)	—	—
Vendor logic figure	695,800 SLC	489,000 SLC
DSP	1,428 DSP Engines	1,872 DSP slices
Block RAM	22.2 Mb	22.8 Mb
Large RAM	23.3 Mb	45 Mb
Max. user I/O	310	154
Transceivers	24 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s	8 × GTY 28.21 Gb/s
Hard PCI Express	Gen5 x4	None
Hard processor	4× Arm Cortex-A78AE	4× Arm Cortex-A53
Process	—	16 nm
Configuration memory	SRAM	SRAM
Packages	3	1
Design tool	AMD Vivado	AMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

The XC2VM3654 has about 42% more logic capacity (509K vs 358K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the XCZU65DR has 1,872 DSP slices against 1,428 DSP Engines on the XC2VM3654.

The XCZU65DR has more on-chip memory (67.8 Mb vs 45.5 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XC2VM3654 and 8 at up to 28.21 Gb/s on the XCZU65DR.

The XC2VM3654 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCZU65DR with AMD Vivado.